InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,567.19
(
1.06%
)
US TECH 100
19,829.90
(
0.96%
)
Dow Jones
39,375.87
(
0.17%
)
Brent Oil
86.78
(
-0.64%
)
Bitcoin
56,544.55
(
-0.76%
)
Post# of 53980
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

I4C6S

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 5
Posts 211
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/09/2003

I4C6S

Re: rodrth post# 3345

Monday, 07/05/2004 12:31:42 PM

Monday, July 05, 2004 12:31:42 PM

Post# of 53980
rodrth,

"...it would seem to be an advantage for water removal for the cyclone to be maintained at a temperature matching the chamber"

That's how I see it too. IMO the last thing they want is for the cyclone to be cooler. Heating it should help, but I don't know what the break-even point would be. I expect that they will run trials to see if the effort is worth the benefits. I guess that waste heat would be the answer.


Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up