GDT Tek Inc. (fka GDTK)

[ib12u]

[s]SMWF CES 2009 appearance concerns.

Re:
(I don't know why anyone would get excited about whether or not SMWF appears at CES.

They were at the last 2 CES shows, and actually got quite a bit of press coverage for the S-XGEN. Unfortunately, none of that turned into revenue or profits.

Why would this year's show be any different?

This is a fare question to which I will answer in my opinion.

Whereas, if it were ME, I’d do the following;

Never give up on a project you believe in and use ALL resources, legally at your disposal, to see it through.

SO what if nothing may have become of the last CES appearances in the manor so noted.

(Nicola Tesla, Thomas Townsend Brown and many others, for whom I have no words to express my admirations, was mocked on in their attempts to début their Alien Ingenious Creations).

SMWF needn’t quite over a few failures, (assumed as implied) and I don’t believe they’re without knowledge of their competitor’s rivaling products.

I would never haphazardly market products without first researching its market worthiness yet alone infringements.

I would never be interested in a Lotto Play Stock that didn’t have a potentially good niche.

The S-Gens (sXgens), which was the ONLY reason why I’m in this stock, would have been a better push than the SNBK1 which I “KNEW” would be challenged by other (power-house) companies. –In my opinion.

I would NOT have invested in a company whose starting position is with a product that (Looks Like) it “Already Exists” in the market place.

Regardless of all the inner-technical-differences, the Average Consumer only sees a Flat-Rectangle that opens up to a screen and keyboard followed an important deciding factor as whether they should buy it or not, --- PRICE TAG!
…>6^>.

Companies with large capitals can afford to produce “Notebook’Ish” products to be sold at under-prices. (Because the they can always reap the differences of OTHER products they sell at Over-Prices ..Shhhhhhh!)
..>B^>

If my “DD” serves me right, SMWF may not be able to afford cheaper productions at thing time as this may cause their “Forward looking” money-clock to tick Backwards.

Perhaps the intended sales of the SNBK1 could (Would) cover the monetary differences necessary to sell the S-Gens a lot cheaper.

I believe, if the S-Gens were more competitively (aggressively) priced, they would likely be discovered for the technical wizardry they behold, as more average consumers take possession because they can afford to.

The formation of a “Note Book” style Computer is an Open-Design. Anyone with the right Know-How can garage up one and hightail to the nearest retail for solicitation.

The S-GEN is a “Patented” design package and if my “DD” serves me right, SMWF Owns it.


I WANT me the S-Gen. -Solidstate Drive version.
My heart is set on Owning it.
My fingers are itching.


I “KNEW” other companies would tap the SNBK1’s unpatented design scheme and using their “Existing” capital and decades worth of marketing and sales experience, will likely produce their OWN version(s) at even a cheaper price, using production facilities they already have.

I’m sorry to say but the SNBK1 looks like a glorified commodore 64 with a Lid.
(Although I’m sure it’s technically decades ahead of one)
Maybe SMWF should consider a different packaging.

Other than that, I think SMWF is lotto play worth my investment, given its Niche.

…to be continued

(or maybe not)

..>9^}