InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 46
Posts 5000
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/16/2008

Re: roberto77479 post# 8609

Wednesday, 01/07/2009 1:56:23 PM

Wednesday, January 07, 2009 1:56:23 PM

Post# of 83074
Roberto I hope you are right. If I remember correctly you spoke to John recently? I wonder if he understands the frustration that some of us have? The Jan 5 PR should have been positive for the PPS but the lack of details seems to have actually hurt our positions. I wonder if we would be in the .006 or .007's if we were told about the status and location of the processors? Here is my main point: If management put a bit more effort and detail into the PR would that have had a positive effect on our PPS? I may be way off and it may not have made a difference but why not give us that information? I am obviously frustrated by this stock solely due to the PPS. I believe that is my right as a shareholder. Many of us are feeling the same way.
Roberto, I will take your advice and wait for the next communication at the end of the month. (What choice do many of us have with the PPS at the current level?) I'm sure John's comments put you at ease and that does make me feel a little better, but at some point SGC needs to release abundant and detailed information on its operations. I am hoping that we don't have to keep hoping that, "Next month's numbers will be great. The next PR will turn around the PPS."