![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Friday, December 26, 2008 7:53:31 AM
The orignal articles out were saying it was a three year license only. Then they realized their own mistake on the issue.
It is a perpetual license. The license calls for product to be produced and provided to the licensee for three years; undoubtedly at cost IMO. Then the licensee must have a brewery selected.
My point was a good bet for DKAM as they have three years to show what they can do to improve or expand the brand and then sell it back to InBev.
What difference does it make anyways? Let's just make sure we're a bidder. Then if we are, let's make sure we win the darn thing. Then once we win, we can argue whether it goes to single digits or double digits based on such merits.
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM
Avant Technologies Welcomes Back Former CEO with Eye Toward Future Growth and Expansion • AVAI • Jul 17, 2024 8:00 AM