If the theory of a buyout is correct, an amount per share will be stipulated with a date of record at a much higher PPS than .023, right? Whoever is behind BMAS would have to be upset if company was making an agreement with MM's to cover, right? Because that would be potentially taking money out of BMAS's pockets from forcing MM/Nite to cover? BMAS surely wouldn't want that, correct? Assuming whoever BMAS is, if BMAS could be the buyer as you are guessing? Also if paperwork were signed with any buyer, I'm sure there would have to be all kinds of stipulations saying company can't change the share structure once contracts are signed, unless two sides made an agreement to do so for some odd reason? I have some thoughts that are more difinitive than others and some thoughts are just taking me off the tracks. Again, all this idle time kills the stock and shareholders as they wait for company to take the stand they promised 3 months ago that was supposedly coming in that 90 day plan. Time is about up, so hope "right after Christmas" we get info. I mean INFO to make this go up 5X, 10X or more.
