InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 460
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/14/2008

Re: arnold post# 13379

Sunday, 12/21/2008 2:09:19 PM

Sunday, December 21, 2008 2:09:19 PM

Post# of 28183
Arnold,

Okay, I think I understand your point.

To your point I freely admitted that the system was running on compressed air. I see no real distinction in this application between compressed air and pressurized steam except one. Friction would be reduced in the steam application.

The engine Piecemaker taped was a standalone fully functioning machine. I feel that the previous only proves the later. Not a big stretch for me. Heat to water. Water to Steam. Steam to motion. Motion to work done.

FrazDog


There are no rules here! We are trying to accomplish something! "Thomas Edison"

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.