DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[Porgie Tirebiter]

You are missing the whole point - again.

The patent application acknowledges intellectual property owned by among many others, DNAPrint. But it is a patent application for a product to be called DNAWitness, and it has not been filed on behalf of DNAPrint. It has been filed on behalf of three individuals, two of whom happen to be it's officers, and a third party.

The executives who are in charge should be defending their trademarks. They should be defending DNAPrint's (your) "intellectual property". I'm not saying anyone is doing anything wrong, far from it. I think what they are doing is completely above board, and perfectly legal. But it may not be completely in line with shareholder's interest.

I don't think shareholders are paying enough attention to what is going on with this company. You deserve answers from these guys. You deserve to know that they are acting in your interests, and not carrying the intellectual property out the back door.

Believe it or not, despite the severe abuse you heap onto the poor guy, UkiwiS is trying to do you a favor.