![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Monday, December 15, 2008 12:40:47 PM
For the RS to be useful in this current market, they cannot afford to alienate their current longs. I personally would welcome a reasonable RS where a reasonable amount of sustained volume would generate pps volitility (upwards).
So what would the new share structure look like? What kind of RS would be acceptable to enough shareholders that would compel us to reach a further into our pockets in order to have a place on the gravy train?
If 1000:1 RS, then Peter wont be able to sell shares post RS unless its a potential partner buying in.
As for me I'd rather take a hit by a 10:1 RS than be totally wiped out by a 1000:1 RS.
JMHO - P.
Great minds board: http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=5388
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM