InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 4220
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2003

Re: worktoplay post# 15136

Wednesday, 06/23/2004 2:28:25 PM

Wednesday, June 23, 2004 2:28:25 PM

Post# of 82595
worktoplay,

I have no problem in waiting for the shareholders meeting for the answers. As you pointed out, that's why we wrote it. The reason for the list and the decision to send it early was based on allowing the company time to formulate their answers, in time for the meeting.

What I am trying to avoid is the potential letdown of investors in the event that they attend the meeting with expectations that are dashed when the company says, "What list?"

It is all well and good to read between the lines of the Dutton PR and try to glean some reference that 'might' indicate they have seen the list. Unfortunately, in the absence of a simple email acknowledgement we are left with nothing else to even suggest that they have received it.

I'm not asking for the moon, I'm asking for a simple response to indicate that they have received the list. They can even decline to answer the questions if they want. That in itself would be an indication.

There are only two reasons that I can imagine for not acknowledging receipt of the message. They never got it, or they got it but don't wish to acknowledge it.

The former we can easily circumvent by using your established communication channel, the latter we will just have to live with.

regards,
frog