I have read it. You should read that of the K-Series that was written first.
Just because such a thing as "parity" supposedly exists, doesn't
make it possible. It is just like saying everybody is EQUAL. That is
complete ridiculousness.
If a debtor owed creditor A $1,000 for the last 2 years and owed
creditor B $1,000 for the last 2 months. Even though they are owed
that same amount of money and could be in "parity", however, logic
tells me that creditor A would get paid before creditor B 99% of
the time, even though they are EQUAL.
That's what I think, but it doesn't matter what I think, what matters is what you think!!!
