Qualcomm Inc (QCOM)

[JeffreyHF]

You have confused two different cases. Yesterday's "contempt" ruling arose from Judge Selna's Injunction concerning two Broadcom patents that were found to have been violated by a jury in Santa Ana. The PR you cite, concerns the ITC finding of a power saving patent that was infringed, that had resulted in an Exclusion Order, that was reversed on appeal as to downstream chip customers.
The chips affected by yesterday's "contempt" finding are no longer made, having been replaced by redesigned, non-infringing products.