That's the problem here - I ask you to verify innuendo that is being posted by you as fact... and you ignore my request..
Who is the insider here? What price did he try to sell to the other insiders for? Who are the other insiders?
re"My point is that whoever held the preferreds couldn't find any better way to get rid of them than to convert first. The other insiders didn't want them, despite all their supposed advantages--"
You state the above as fact... then offer some proof, or retract your comments please.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.