InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 19
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/25/2008

Re: lev1917 post# 1475

Friday, 11/07/2008 11:00:17 AM

Friday, November 07, 2008 11:00:17 AM

Post# of 1964
Your optimism is pretty impressive, Lev. I don't think this is a tactic by Mary to reorganize and shed the debt, because:

1. Mary has used the publicly traded stock of e-Smart to raise cash. Without that, she has nothing to offer in exchange for cash.

2. The involuntary BK petitions are filed against three entities -- e-Smart, IVI, and IVI Smart--not just e-Smart. They are chapter 7 -- liquidation -- BK's. The companies would be liquidated, so there would be nothing left for Mary to take forward.

3. The shareholder lawsuit is against the directors and Mary Grace as individuals. That lawsuit survives any bankruptcy and dissolution of the companies themselves.

4. The current SEC investigation against Mary and e-Smart may result in more limitations in her future activities with public companies.

The only winners will be the lawyers. Trading in this stock has already ceased. Eventual delisting, bankruptcy, and liquidation will be an anticlimax.

Turn out the lights when you leave this discussion board. This party's over.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.