DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[dgplexus]

"frogdreaming,"

Hogwash.

You say, "What you are NOT permitted to do (unchallenged) is to try to influence innocent investors with unsupported fantasies and a complete lack of knowledge regarding the history and milestones of the company." I have not done that. You aren't any more "permitted" than I am, to make up B.S. and try to pass it off as fact. Which is why we keep challenging you, and disproving your claims. You have yet to retract even a single one of the since-disproven claims you have made. That doesn't inspire one's confidence in your writings.

Inventing things, and putting your own extreme "spin" on other things, does not constitute honest portrayal of anything, or "proof" of anything.

You make a claim, you prove it. Enough dancing around and trying to appeal to your own supposed authority. It isn't cutting it. Your "authority" is not worth anything. Substantiate something that you claim, and then you may be taken seriously, on that specific claim. You do not, at any point, become the unchallenged spewer of arbitrary "truths."

Retract your lies, already. Need I rub your nose in them once more, to remind you of them? Are you hoping that we'll forget about them?

Enough with the unfounded personal attacks and conspiracy theories, already.

Proud to be a DNAG shareholder,

Daniel Gannon
Portland, Oregon, USA