DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[dgplexus]

"frogdreaming,"

I don't see any evidence to support your claims, I only see still _more_ unsubstantiated claims from you, and an unfounded personal attack, as well. Notably, I also see no retractions from you, or even an attempt to address that issue.

Dr. Frudakis is not "a liar and a cheat," and you have provided no evidence whatsoever, to substantiate this dastardly personal attack against him.

People who understand the patent application process know that DNAPrint Genomics' patent applications have been proceeding normally. Several of them have already been granted. Patents, and patent applications, are good things. The applications are often not approved as-is, the first time around. Modifications are common.

You are also totally ignoring the recent quotes, from this year, coming from companies/agencies that are working with DNAPrint Genomics. All of those comments have been positive; I have yet to see anything negative. Also, if it's all a "scam" and nothing is being done, how is it possible that all of these collaborations exist, and we're seeing only positive news and comments come out of those? (See the links that Sam1933 posted.)

DNAPrint Genomics has my trust and admiration. They've earned it. I won't let anyone con me into thinking otherwise.

Daniel Gannon
Portland, Oregon, USA