InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 721
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/17/2007

Re: uccaducca post# 79799

Monday, 11/03/2008 5:32:14 PM

Monday, November 03, 2008 5:32:14 PM

Post# of 82595
"uccaducca,"

You insinuate that all investors would simply drop the stock like a rock, as if it were utterly valueless (which it most emphatically isn't,) and the authorized share limit reached again, in no time at all, and that the company is just sitting on its collective thumbs, with no chance of turning a profit, ever. I don't subscribe to that assessment.

As I said, I would be a buyer. I'm not the only buyer, either. All those transactions today at .0005, those were other buyers. I didn't buy any shares today. We saw respectable volume at .0005. We're well off the bottom of .0002.

There is no rational reason for your extremely pessimistic scenario to play out. It's pure fantasy.

You aren't going to be able to dissuade me from continuing to buy DNAG stock. smile

Why is it, I wonder, that several of the home runs I've hit this year (stocks I bought that I made dramatic gains with,) were constantly smothered by "the sky is falling!" propaganda? I've learned how much such talk is worth... considerably less than nothing. In fact, I view is as a valuable contrary indicator. The more loudly people say the sky is falling, the less I believe them.

smile

Daniel Gannon
Portland, Oregon, USA