Again you misuse the word "contrarian". Is that your favorite word?
In finance, a contrarian is one who attempts to profit by investing in a manner that differs from the conventional wisdom, when the consensus opinion appears to be wrong.
You continually use that name to describe anybody who says anything bad about the stocks you promote. Funny thing is, the concensus opinion of the stocks you support is to sell the junk.
ERUC down 60% on your watch means the popular opinion was negative. The share price shows the concensus opinion. If the opinion is good the pps creeps up steadily. If the concensus opinion is negative it trends downward.
ANVH down about 45%. Overall concensus for the 60 days is negative.
The contrarian opinion on the stocks you promote come from those who believe the company will actually amount to anything.
ERUC is now .0001 and ANVH is now .018 which represents huge declines. 2 years ago ERUC was .20, went to .03, reverse split 1:13 and now sits at .0001 so the contrarian opine as you like to say rests on those who thought it was going to actually do well.
ANVH reversed in May. Was $7.01 but has fallen all the way to .018 which represents a massice loss. The contrarian opine there also belongs to the people who thought it would do well. Even if you want to say the $7.01 was artificial there would have tobe an area in there somewhere that this would have caught a bottom. That one is going down, still is.
So why do you try and make those who listen to your twisted appraoch out to be the "popular opinion" when, in fact they are actually subscribing to the "contrarian opine" which you attempt to label those who are pointing out what a POS the company is?
