I was waiting for somebody to say that :) Problem is that the volume during the day was still a minority -- 187k of over 600k in volume. The 187k was probably the shares that actually DID trade at the dominated ask by WEED. The other 400k+ was bidwhacking galore. Remember, this stock in September traded for under 50,000 shares some days so pointing to 187k doesn't explain the other 400k. :)
Of course it was VMC and others reading their posts and flipping out in a drooling panic.
About VMC themselves, I never claimed to be "better" than them when it comes to DD sharing. Hell, I can never find the most insignificant crap that they dig up from a filing from 2003 on some janitor taking an unapproved day off. Kudos and congrats! The investigative research they do makes me feel like an absolute nothing! I do think, however, I'm able to keep my emotions in check far far far far far better than most (that's easy), and FAR more important than finding nitpicking DD is being able to analyze its SIGNIFICANCE which I find the VMC do be incredibly poor at doing, despite their superior ability to find the most insiginficant of crap that nobody else can find.
Remember all of that garbage analysis on ZYXI digging out the most insignificant trash before they dumped 100s thousands of shares (in some cases each investor) just before a 500% runup? Where did all that nitpicking get them? NOWHERE, because they didn't have the faintest clue how to analyze it's significance and became scared to death of the irrelevant garbage "ZYNX_WB" was saying.
Raw
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
