InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 9421
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/30/2006

Re: opportunityknocking post# 16720

Thursday, 10/09/2008 10:32:48 AM

Thursday, October 09, 2008 10:32:48 AM

Post# of 30387
Look what he has done to manipulate the results. You do not know what kind of cancer RECAF is looking at because it doesn't know so you can delete any referece to a type of cancer. Next, he is varying the cutoff level to manipulate the results.
Is the real cutoff level 4900, 4600, 4550 or 4800. A doctor attempting to determine if a test is positive has to know what the value is. This is just BS to manipulate the data.

The normal cutoff he has used has been 4500. He has obviously raised the cutoff level to exclude some very high reading normals between 4500 and 4900 to increase the specificity of the results.

Who knows the number of false positives he has hidden by moving the cutoff level higher? This is total manipulation.

I guess that is why clinical trials tell the truth and studies don't.



Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.