InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 927
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/27/2005

Re: HALF FULL GLASS post# 16643

Tuesday, 10/07/2008 12:51:22 PM

Tuesday, October 07, 2008 12:51:22 PM

Post# of 30387
Wouldn't you ask yourself if there was 90%+ sensitivity with saliva-recaf why wouldn't you expand the study? If he said anything during your alleged conversation it would make sense to say he would say they are encouraged, and they won't comment on expectations until they have tested an adequate varity of types and stages of cancer. He would not have a job if he said anything to bias the data at this point. His job is objective. Gather data. Report the data. That is it. You comments are based on opinion. If he saw that it would not work he would not EXPAND the study. Does that action imply his findings were negative? You put YOUR inerpretion on everything to create doubt. You can't refute data or the actions by Dr Pennington. GS, you are out of bullets.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.