InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 927
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/27/2005

Re: dakota post# 16466

Friday, 10/03/2008 9:46:23 AM

Friday, October 03, 2008 9:46:23 AM

Post# of 30387
The point is missed. It detected the cancer. Symptoms have nothing to do with it. I will repeat that it detected cancer from a saliva sample.
This why you should never listen to a lay individual. He is misrepresenting facts and attempted to dismiss what this actually has accomplished.
Now does anyone still need convincing that there are ulterior motives at play?
You do not need to be a scientist to fully comprehend what a truly SIGNIFICANT discovery has been made.
Reread kag's post and you decide for yourself.
Before anyone gets too excited about today's press release by BioCurex, it is important to not overlook two important sentences in Dr. Pennington's statement. One of those sentences is: "The current patients tested have evidence of widespread disease." (Only 15 patients were tested and they all had widespread cancer.) Dr. Pennington further states: "It will be important to study the saliva of patients with early stage disease to see if these findings are present in early stages as well." The significance of these two statements is that doctors hardly need a RECAF saliva test to determine if a patient has cancer that has spread throughout the body. The patient would probably be very sick. kag

Shareholders will decide. Again I am sorry for those that were duped.


Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.