InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 48
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/12/2008

Re: Our-Street post# 13335

Saturday, 09/27/2008 11:58:50 AM

Saturday, September 27, 2008 11:58:50 AM

Post# of 28831
1. I don't know how many here are convinced that Jack is the person you said. Only when the prosecuted agreed in front of policeman or court will I be convince.
Saying the other way, if what you said is true, can we imagine like this: A man had bad history but now he wants or is doing a good business. He doesn't want the good business is affected by the bad history. So, he is hiding. At the end, we come to the same conclusion: you need to prove this is a bad business, they are not earning money for shareholders.

2. sorry I didn't read about Buzz India

3. The hiring is always controversial. You say this way. He says that way.

4. I agree with you because they agreed they didn't hire yyk.


To name it a scam, I want you prove two things:

1.they didn't earn money for shareholders, but instead, they are rooting money from shareholder.

2.They are dumping shares and then issuing more and dumping again. This is the way to root innocent shareholders.