There is no proof the SEC could find that RPH profited from this....even if you believe the bogus PR claim. Even after two years....nada. They even gave up on the bond issues, relying on the UCC note instead. The best they could do was get a ML broker, who is on the hook for $40K ( because he sold his clients shares when he shouldn't have and had to buy them back ), testify that RPH relatives intended to dump all their free trading shares, which they had a legal right to do,.... but in fact they only wanted to borrow money against those shares. Nothing wrong with that.
Sorry no dump...at least not from RPH anyways...
The DOJ will have to do better, because unless they can PROVE he profited, they cannot charge him anything. And anyways, he was fined because he defaulted...many here have said this.
The appeal will set this all straight.
BCIT? Preventing it from unfreez-... what? In your dreams canteen boy. - clarity Oct 22, 2008
