The Rufus paradox strikes again. In case anyone has doubts the man is a liar, check this out:
I'll start off by stating that it is FACT that Rufus had been priding himself on forcing this issue to court. Even though ALL SEC cases are federal, Rufus has stated he wanted this in a federal court and got his way. LOL!
Now, thanks to dirtdigger on HSM, here is a post from Rufus:
"Boss
Re: THURSDAY SEPT. 11TH, 2008
Reply #210 on: Yesterday at 04:00:28 PM
Oh Alana, the Judge denied you disgorgement for the lack of Evidence and Facts!!!
What did yall do for the past 2 years?? I can not wait until yall are answering questions about why you did not go after the fake market shares and How insiders such as MA, DP and JG were able to sell shares!!!!
Here is the real truth about yesterday People; the SEC could have passed the fines and restrictions on to me without the court!!! So.......... what was yesterday really about?
When you understand that; then you understand what is going on!!! And yes it is Simple Stupid!!!"
So on one hand, Rufus calls it victory that he got the case to court. Now that it got there and nothing came out of it, Rufus is challenging why it went to court in the first place.
BTW - If I'm not mistaken, the SEC can impose fines without court. But only to those companies that cooperate and agree to said fines before going to court. Even then, it may still require a judge to agree to the fines in question.
Rufus is lying to the faithful again.
