DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[mingwan0]

The next post contains the amended list of questions. I have reflected all the changes suggested to date with the exception of the further numbering breakdown suggested by Robert, for which I still await a statement on consensus.

There appears to be some cynicism about whether the company will answer the questions. If we do not provide questions I can guarantee that the company will not answer them! We can only submit them and see. I have no reason to believe that the company would not find such a list useful input and indeed provide answers, unless they felt there was a good reason for not doing so (which I hope could also be communicated). If the company were not to provide any answers then IMO charges of lack of communication would indeed have some basis. Let's submit the list and see what happens.

Bag8ger was concerned about the appropriateness of questions relative to the potential newsletter and shareholder meeting. My view is that if the company has the superset of questions they can determine which will be covered by the proposed newsletter, or could be added to the end of this document in a Q&A section, and which it is more appropriate to address in another manner e.g. at the shareholder's meeting.

Can I suggest that Frog sends the final list by email to investor relations at 17:00 EST on Monday? I suggest a covering note similar to the following:

Dear Sir/Madam

Please find attached a list of questions that have been prepared and reviewed by posters on the Investors Hub and Raging Bull boards. We would be grateful if the company would consider these as input to the proposed shareholder meeting and/or to any newsletter (or similar communication) that the company might issue.