InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 70
Posts 9741
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/21/2007

Re: bdahl385 post# 39172

Thursday, 09/04/2008 12:01:26 PM

Thursday, September 04, 2008 12:01:26 PM

Post# of 51429
bdalh385, think about what you just wrote and look at the entire sheet of information provided by this Kansas newspaper.

A newspaper is going to go back 17 months and pull that HMGP information using todays date? Most newspapers today check and double check their information and resources including dated information

Are you also implying that all the other reports shown by this newspaper are outdated by this time factor as well regarding production info?

It just amazes me how every piece of favorable or positive information report by Hemi, reported by a participant of this board, or reported by a third party resource gets shot down so quickly by some individuals.

Hemi has gone on record with the 2008 PR's indicating that such production information does exist.............How???

By stating that oil production is covering month to month expenses and ongoing drilling activies;

AND

By stating that Hemi is "tanking" oil from current production.

These two factors combined support the fact that Hemi is producing a good flow of oil and just as easily as you state this is an old news item, the case is just as strong that this Kansas newspaper 09/04/08 Hemi Reno information is current.

Again I was there in May @ Hemi SEK and while I was there I witness a pick up of oil from the Hemi Reno and from what I witness the indication/ discussion was that these pick ups we a bit more frequent than a 5 BOD count from this site.

Now are you going to tell me that I was back in time too.

Kels










Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.