InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 1725
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/13/2008

Re: DennisCT post# 4281

Thursday, 08/21/2008 8:20:10 PM

Thursday, August 21, 2008 8:20:10 PM

Post# of 30922
Thanks MO2 was away on vacation, and my
little Iphone and small screen prevented me from paying real close attention to the board.

It just struck me as odd that Mesquite CA pic would be used..



But anyway, after reading the PDF file, I am now left with even more questions......
Lots of flip flopping on wording...

7 ounces per ton, is now based on the total of the earth in tonnage that they are allowed to mine versus the total assumed mineral content...

Wording like 7oz per ton in the PR is just blatantly wrong, but wording it like they did in the PDF is a little different.
Gonna read some more, and do some mapping....