InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 333
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/25/2004

Re: doe post# 1286

Monday, 05/24/2004 1:07:45 PM

Monday, May 24, 2004 1:07:45 PM

Post# of 60937
I don`t know in detail how the differences is between the comapnies regarding speed, cost and capacity. But I know that BT are working on a project together with several european companies to find a joint solution that combines hotspots/hotzones here they are talking about how the consumer can save money.

http://oban.prz.tu-berlin.de/

When it comes to capacity they are also working on a compressing solution togther with Orsus Solutions, so i think the compressing part is making up for eventual advantage for CLYW`s part here.

When it comes to 4 I will just have to say that we are talking less that a second where the client are connecting one net and keeping the other, so i don`t know if there exactly is any differnce. espcially in countries like norway where we have on or two big companies that all have GSM/GRPS, UMTS and WLAN nets, so it will be the same operator used many times. Also BT have hotspot software deployed several places and the BT hotspot-sofware will of course be working real good together, so it can be sold as a package to a lot of operators!

My point is that I think CLYW, BT and competitors have the same vision but minor differencies in their solution. ASNAP is probably going to be a bit more expensive than BTMIP beacuse it involves hardware (correct me if I am wrong!). BTMIP is price at 20 dollars today and the price is likely of fall more during the year. Similiar solution to ASNAP (nemotion and Ipunplugged) are pricing at 80 dollars.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.