You're not really that dense, capnmike, and neither am I.
A contract for purchase or lease isn't the same as a contract concluding a lease or sale. You know that as well as I do. The contract for a purchase or lease will have conditions in it that will have to be met before a purchase or lease happens. The outfit given the "tool" for testing purposes will have the final say so: we lease/buy or we don't. There is usually one condition in particular: that the thing that is subject of the contract for purchase or lease actually works as claimed AND is deemed to be worth purchasing or leasing.
Easy enough to keep giving them away in the meantime with those clever, easily misconstrued contracts (intentionally misleading and misconstrued by the giver-awayer) attached and publicized as if the lease or sale were a done deal.
As I've said before, M. Pouligny has worked very hard for cdex.
Malcbaby: "Just place them and we'll take care of the PR."
Pouligny: "Pas de probleme."
It's the contract with M. Pouligny you should be thinking about.
This is all very reminiscent of the infamous NDA touted so many years ago. Many peeps thought that NDA meant the sexy little Vammp (or was it Vaamp? can;t remember), along with Loch, was just about to hit the big time and make kazillionaires out of sh'holders, which of course they weren't and didn't.
So I repeat: Give us names, dates and figures for concluded sales or leases. Do not keep trying to pull the wool over any more unsuspecting cdex sh'holders' eyes.
