InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,427.13
(
-2.31%
)
US TECH 100
18,535.20
(
0.00%
)
Dow Jones
39,853.87
(
-1.25%
)
Brent Oil
80.59
(
-0.19%
)
Bitcoin
64,104.43
(
-1.94%
)
Post# of 43413
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

MasterSalix

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 50
Posts 2809
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/13/2008

MasterSalix

Re: Carpedeim357 post# 21136

Thursday, 08/14/2008 5:56:41 PM

Thursday, August 14, 2008 5:56:41 PM

Post# of 43413
sure thing...but we own the company - and if a material event happened that changed the value, and hence the sales price, of a subsidiary of the company - we must be told about it.

I am just not buying this .265 thing....

Further, I highly doubt that the purchaser would sign an agreement that allows Galo to just name higher and higher prices based on future events - most likely, the contract locks in a purchase price (as most do) - if it does have an extension clause, as some contracts do, that range would have to be previously contracted (might be why we were given the .19 - .23 range in the first place)....but .265? That isn't in that range - that means, new agreement, new contact....Possible? Sure. Likely? No.

Behold the fool saith, "Put not all thine eggs in the one basket"--which is but a manner of saying, "Scatter your money and your attention;" but the wise man saith, "Put all your eggs in the one basket and--WATCH THAT BASKET."
- Mark Twain

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up