I do not believe minimum govt has to mean near no legislative protection against bad business practice.Or does it?
Maybe low govt interference needs specific definitions? I believe in minimal taxes,minimal govt spending,minimal armed forces.Now you have huge govt interference in the USA ,but none of the protections you imply are needed.Is that the worst of both worlds?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.