InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,751.07
(
0.90%
)
US TECH 100
19,476.00
(
1.10%
)
Dow Jones
42,352.75
(
0.81%
)
Brent Oil
77.97
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
62,232.79
(
0.26%
)
Post# of 41740
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Ugo22

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 2425
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/18/2007

Ugo22

Re: Cee-It post# 28215

Wednesday, 08/13/2008 3:51:34 PM

Wednesday, August 13, 2008 3:51:34 PM

Post# of 41740
I felt that way at first 2, but a Google Search is a Google search and is pattented as well, right?

"IMO the limited distinctions within the GOOGLE patent are still very much equivalent to claims already clearly covered and envisioned within the claims of ONEV."

Google wanted to have their cake and eat it too thats all that happened... USPTO said no ONEV already patented the way in... If you read the Patent google got approved you will find the same ONEV process included in the rejection letter, Google does not own that. ONEV does, globally.

Webers Quote from 7/08 CC "Look at Google with their voice patents and what do they have? They have a sub-set of our voice patent."

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up