InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,973.92
(
0.76%
)
US TECH 100
20,512.00
(
1.43%
)
Dow Jones
43,746.93
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
75.50
(
0.57%
)
Bitcoin
76,569.32
(
1.22%
)
Post# of 41740
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Ugo22

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 2425
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/18/2007

Ugo22

Re: Iris_F post# 27961

Sunday, 08/10/2008 3:32:29 PM

Sunday, August 10, 2008 3:32:29 PM

Post# of 41740
How can you state or think Google went in a different direction? They did not and they highlighted why what ONEV does is needed in the process.

http://blog.onev.com/blogsite/2008/06/voice-search-patents.html#more

"Subsequently, Google was issued a voice search patent and had a difficult time narrowing their patent around One Voice. Enjoy reading..."

Then the CEO came out and publicly stated the google patent is a subset.

If google narrowed their patent "around" the ONEV patent that leaves ONEV in the center of it all.




Webers Quote from 7/08 CC "Look at Google with their voice patents and what do they have? They have a sub-set of our voice patent."

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up