Your analogy doesn't hold up however.
If you are a share holder you will be happy. This means your scenario can't pan out because then you would be an unhappy shareholder. You are adding to the equation something which has not been claimed, said, or implied outside of your adding it to the context.
You are doing alot of worrying and analysis on what Dean says. You should try analyzing what is going on. There were many clues and some out right statements that point to major things happening in a good way. You're problem in my opinion is you are asking the wrong questions.
If you want to analyze something ask yourself these questions for starters.
1) Why would Carlos slim send so much revenue contract wise to ONEV and not get a piece of the action?
2) Who are the private investors, and why would they be willing to pay a premium for the current shares of stock? (I believe they are, and that they have very good rational, smart busines reasons to do so. There is one contrary to what most people say on here.)
3)What kind of telephone companies have CEOS (we know the private financiers are ceos of telephone companies) that would be able to pass a major purchase of shares above the current share price to their board of directors.
Ask yourself these questions and try and come up with the logical answers. Do some reasearch that isn't on Ihub. These answers will lead you to more questions and suddenly it will all come together. You will be amazed how crystal clear everything becomes and how pure genius it is when you discover the answers. Very good things are on the way.
By the way, we wont see a single contract from Mexico signed until the private financiers finish their business with the the current funders.
I can't prove any of this of course, but I am certain I am right. Those who have figured it out can make a fortune.
All just my humble opinion.
AI
