![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Tuesday, August 05, 2008 7:08:52 AM
One of the NASDAQ officials asked the question about whether there was a "no-shorting" provision in the agreement with Cornell. The answer was "uhhh..we aren't sure" or words to that effect. So when the first deal was finalized, there was such a provision.
It did not matter, we got de-listed.
Subsequently, I believe that that provision was not contained in later Cornell SEDA deals. If the provision was important enough for NASDAQ to ask about, it would be interesting to know if it was contained in all subsequent SEDA deals, and if not, why not?
Each of those deals was negotiated by someone.
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM