InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252302
Next 10
Followers 129
Posts 2150
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/27/2007

Re: BioSpecialist post# 62353

Wednesday, 07/30/2008 4:54:22 AM

Wednesday, July 30, 2008 4:54:22 AM

Post# of 252302
Cerepro(R) Phase III results meet primary endpoint

Ark Therapeutics Group PLC 30 July 2008

# Secondary endpoints yet to be established with 45% of patients still alive -

London, UK 30 July 2008 - Ark Therapeutics Group plc (AKT:LSE) today announces that the preliminary analysis of Study 904, a Phase III study of Cerepro(R), its novel gene-based therapy being developed as an Orphan Drug for the treatment of operable primary malignant glioma, demonstrates that the trial has met its primary endpoint. Cerepro(R) treatment resulted in significant improvements in median survival on the primary endpoint compared with various control groups. In the secondary endpoints, with 45% of patients still alive, benefits have yet to be established.

Study 904 was a multicentre, standard care controlled, pivotal trial in 236 patients designed, following advice from the EMEA, to confirm the safety and efficacy of Cerepro(R) in patients with operable high grade glioma (brain cancer) against current standard care treatment options. Patients were randomised to either standard care plus Cerepro(R) or standard care alone. Standard care was surgery and radiotherapy or surgery and radiotherapy followed by temozolomide, depending on the investigating centres' standard practice and patient suitability, giving four treatment groups. This allowed comparison of the efficacy of Cerepro(R) and temozolomide in the same trial without denying patients what physicians considered the appropriate established standard care. The primary endpoint was survival, defined as time to death or re-intervention(1). At randomisation, the treatment groups were well matched in terms of demographics and the standard prognostic features (age, Karnofsky Score etc).

The overall combined controls primary endpoint analysis in the Intention to Treat (ITT) population (n=236) compared Cerepro(R) with and without temozolomide against controls with and without temozolomide. It showed a 42 day improvement in median survival (310 days vs 268 days) and the improvement over standard care reached significance (p<0.032). The analysis was performed approximately 14 months after completion of recruitment.

On the primary endpoint, the group given Cerepro(R) and temozolomide showed an improvement of 68% in median survival time compared with standard care surgery and radiotherapy controls (350 days vs 208 days). Against the same controls, treatment with Cerepro(R) alone showed an improved median survival trend approaching 50%, similar to those given treatment with temozolomide alone after surgery and radiotherapy (300 days and 307 days respectively vs 208 days with standard care). Improvements in the combined Cerepro(R) and temozolomide treatment group (n=58) and temozolomide alone group (n=76) were significant (p<0.05). In the smaller Cerepro(R) alone treatment group (n=61), the effect is approaching significance (p<0.065) with 16% still to report an event. Of the total 53 patients still to report an event, only 7 are in the surgery and radiotherapy control group and thus confidence intervals and statistical significance levels in all treatment groups might be expected to improve with time.

On the secondary endpoints, which include MRI based progression, all-cause mortality, safety and quality of life, the effects of Cerepro(R) treatment have yet to be established with around 45% of patients still alive. Data from a further time point analysis are needed to fully elucidate this.

Whilst increases were observed in hemiparesis, aphasia and pyrexia following therapy, the serious adverse event reports for Cerepro(R) were in line with those in previous studies, indicating that the product has an acceptable safety profile.

An updated analysis will be conducted in January 2009 according to the plan and all patients with be tracked until death in accordance with the gene therapy regulations.

The results of the study are expected to be presented at the European Association of Neuro-Oncology in Barcelona on 11-14 September 2008.

Commenting on the results Dr David Eckland, R&D Director at Ark, said: "We are very gratified that Cerepro has demonstrated efficacy in this multi-centre Phase III gene therapy study. This is in keeping with our experience and expectation of the product and we now have further evidence to show Cerepro(R) has an anti-cancer effect. Our next steps are to complete the full analysis and meet with our EMEA rapporteur to determine the way forward."

Dr Nigel Parker, CEO at Ark, added: "This is the first gene therapy product to successfully reach its primary endpoint in a major Phase III trial. With a number of patients in the trial still to report an event, there is a substantial amount of further information to come and we will update the analysis after the turn of the year in parallel with our regulatory activities. Malignant glioma is one of the most aggressive of all human diseases and to have seen a positive effect for Cerepro(R) in this disease area is very encouraging. Ark's adenoviral delivery technology has the potential to deliver a new era of gene-based therapies for acute and chronic human disease."

(1) Re-intervention is defined as any kind of treatment (surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy) given to prolong survival after tumour recurrence.

A conference call for analysts will be held at 9.00am today, 30 July 2008. Please call Claire Rowell on 0207 269 7285 for details.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.