InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 142
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/24/2005

Re: Gold Seeker post# 15371

Tuesday, 07/29/2008 9:10:45 AM

Tuesday, July 29, 2008 9:10:45 AM

Post# of 30387
Actually, I believe they had revised the "agreement" or Abbott MIGHT have returned the license but in return for not having to pay the $50,000 they upped the royalty for RECAF, kept the agreement (with changes) but ever since the GE sale was anticipated, would not actively work on anything in that area. If BOCX could do their work for them, why return the license as it at that point was a win-win as far as they were concerned. They had to license Recaf in the beginning at LEAST as a defensive move as IF it took off, it could seriously hurt one of their big products.


Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.