InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 31
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/27/2007

Re: ITGuy post# 54666

Friday, 07/25/2008 5:25:13 PM

Friday, July 25, 2008 5:25:13 PM

Post# of 86929
Agreed ITGUY As I have said from the very begining, it doesn't matter what we discuss or speculate about, it's all about the sales, sales, sales. Kinda disappointing about SWARM, but those results may or may not be the true potential of the system anyway as one can probably manipulate the variables to some degree(and it sounds like this Groves character is quite the blowhard). I agree with the consensus, why steal the software of a failed system unless it has at least SOME potential?
No doubt though, Paul or whoever hired those two made a serious error in judgement and did not do a complete background check until it was far too late. Not to mention checking the results of SWARM, because most of us did the double-take grinning with glee after viewing the PR. If my business name and reputation were going to be plastered on the results worldwide, I would have verified the statistics myself even if Einstein himself said they checked out.

But, the successful businessman lives and learns from their own mistakes. Being a fairly large sharholder, even after everything that's occurred, I still feel confident in the future of Spooz.

On a personal note, let's hope the information for the upcoming PR on revenues is clear and concise and verifiable so we can finally put an end to all the X-file scam conspiracies here on the forums.