InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 23
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/18/2001

Re: bbarrett49 post# 1656

Thursday, 03/21/2002 7:13:16 AM

Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:13:16 AM

Post# of 2893
Bruce, I support the notion of a Raging Bull boycott, but think that some explanation is needed. The following are my reasons:

1) They do not enforce their Terms Of Service, but instead make exceptions for "favored posters" or for those who intimidate RB.

2) After deleting a poster for a very serious TOS violation in the form of slander and personal attacks, they allowed her to return with a different alias, which is contrary to their TOS. They did not remove all her posting history as is provided for in the TOS.

3) They are unresponsive to TOS violation complaints regarding the above, but enforce TOS against less "connected" posters for less serious violations.

4) They permit site hacking and manipulation (another TOS violation) without enforcing any disciplinary action. This included "hiding" posting histories from the profiles, and Member Mark deletion.

5) They are a lot more interested in "hits" than the quality of the board. (They hope someone will actually respond to one of those "Hellish" pop-ups.)

It seems the only message that John CRB (Clown) "Lycos" hears, is the advertisers noticing fewer hits. I don't think that the three current NPCT RB posters are the advertisers' target market. LOL

-jz
Minister of Justice

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NPCT News