Janice:
Clarification: do you mean the "those were the certs Pino" to mean the Carter certs to be what Pino gave his friends?
To me, this means Sytner gave authority to Pino to reissue BCIT certs, does it not?(this is not documented as a fact in court records)
After review of the timeline again in accordance to court documents:
1) Facts 25 and 36 account for the 145 million shares in Summary I for the profit of 269,033(not the $300,000 I referred to earlier)
2) Facts 21(Carter 41 certs = 249+ million shares) and 28(BCIT - share # unknown, at least 125 million)
account for the printing of certificates
As to recovery of Carter certs and reissue BCIT certs, why would this not be disclosed in the court document? If the event occurred, it should have been acknowledged don't you think?.
Am I missing something? This must be how Megas knew to sue all the parties then that turned the Carter Care shares in first lawsuit? Thus, since all shares were not accounted for, he then had to sue what he referred to as 'Fake' shareholders.
Lightbulb turns on.
The bottom line IMO is:
Who had oversight of BCIT because of Megas's priorities during Feb thru July 2005? It now sounds like Sytner had oversight authority of BCIT from Megas and because things were not being done the way Megas wanted it, Megas told Sytner to change the plan by requesting certs reissued. Then Megas decided to sue because things weren't done his way(he has the right) using the information of Carter Care cert holders.
Timeline is looking clearer. Thanks.
Time and the Creator of it are my friends
AI
