InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 1203
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/13/2008

Re: glaszman post# 111188

Monday, 07/21/2008 3:20:01 PM

Monday, July 21, 2008 3:20:01 PM

Post# of 159752
glaszman:

That is why your point of going back to the beginning is valid to provide a timeline from the beginning. So there is no confusion. But, people on this board pick and choose a point in the timeline without consideration of prior timeline points. What came first, the chicken(Megas) or the egg(BCIT)? The history of time should answer this.

Megas incorporated(gave birth) to BCIT thru march-indy. He had and still has the right of possession(recognized by SEC/DTC) and thus has stewardship/responsibility over this property. In an email to art he admitted his busyness during the time of Feb/Jul 2005. This busyness resulted in Pino with the opportunity to usurp the identity of ownership over BCIT, according to court documents. He used other people to do what the court has identified illegal actions. Pam and Pino have been judged and fined. Some may not agree with the judgement, but it has been determined by those in authority.

Because Megas has recognized possession and stewardship/responsiblity over BCIT by the SEC/DTC, he is responsible for cleaning the mess up before the frenzy selling in August occurred. Thus the reverse/merger solution! or is it a solution? I don't know, but what I do know is the introduction of the illegal shares is a direct result of non-oversight or minimal oversight of his property in the period between February and July 2005, based upon the timeline and his words in an email to art.

Megas wants to blame everybody else for his busyness, and there is plenty of blame to go around(SEC,DTC,MMs,the system,etc), but here we are three years later and still not trading. But he is the one in charge of BCIT.

Because Megas has labeled us fake shareholders, he has limited his options of cleaning this mess up. He pretty much has to do it on his own. I guess his $60 million can be used. I could teach a lesson here, but won't to stay on topic.
I understand he will not talk to us or provide insight(except maybe a select few on this board) thru a PR about the BCIT/Energy Source future using lawyers as his rule of conduct. So now people are concerned about SOL. I'm not. I have posted my entering and leaving strategy - 4 years. If its producing at the end of four years, keep it. If not, lop it off. Am I a long on BCIT, absolutely by choice and by others control. A strategy/plan allows consistency in managing my investments.



Time and the Creator of it are my friends

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.