InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,995.54
(
0.38%
)
US TECH 100
20,562.00
(
0.10%
)
Dow Jones
43,988.99
(
0.59%
)
Brent Oil
73.89
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
79,797.47
(
3.93%
)
Post# of 16405
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Gmenfan

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 93
Posts 44453
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 04/07/2007

Gmenfan

Member Level

Re: GeorgiePorgie post# 4875

Friday, 07/18/2008 2:39:54 PM

Friday, July 18, 2008 2:39:54 PM

Post# of 16405
Do everyone catch this post on the Spooz board today. It may explain explain somethings:

Posted by: phillymike Date: Friday, July 18, 2008 11:05:54 AM
In reply to: A deleted message Post # of 53989

I was reading an academic article the other day that stated if there are those who indeed have material naked-short positions in a company such as Spooz ( a start-up in essence), just taking the share price down to .0001 is not enough. In order not to ever have to cover their shorts at all, and fully maximize their profits, they need to have the company go out of business. Just a thought.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up