In my opinion On The Go may have difficulty inforcing the original agreement since the assets of the VAR business had already been assigned to Laurus as part of a convertable funding Can't FTS just claim the agreement was void since On The Go didn't have a clear title to the business anyway? It will still cost both parties legal fees to straighten out. Way different thing than millions in revenues
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.