his clarification was not a clarification. here it is: <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=795065904&play=1" target="_blank">http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=795065904&play=1</a> illegal? legal? it doesn't matter he called it both.... and his explanation was more geared toward trying to explain "short-selling" V naked short-selling he clearly says it is not illegal after he called it illegal... pay attention to his use of the term "should not be hard to locate"... <!--Beg_Sig--> <img src=http://www.suicidegirls.com/media/albums/0/13/130/15625.gif>