InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 120
Posts 6441
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 04/25/2006

Re: AMA1 post# 186696

Tuesday, 07/15/2008 12:32:13 PM

Tuesday, July 15, 2008 12:32:13 PM

Post# of 203990
As far as the equipment not being necessary, that may be true now.
Remember that Swift made some process changes.
They supposedly utilized a evaporator that reduced the overall
moisture content. This change may or may have not been attempted
by Dr. Pandey, but to make a process change in the
beginning of a products inception could have been
disastrous if it caused a variance in the product.

Hence the reason for the equipment being necessary
if Dr. Pandey kept his proven process!

The SUPER DRYERS would have served the same purpose as the evaporator.
One has to remember that they are dealing with MICRO BIOLIGICAL changes that by making a process change it could have have a major change on the overall product!!

That stuff is way over my head but I have had a discussion with a micro biologist and that is what his thoughts were!

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.