InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 1203
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/13/2008

Re: janice shell post# 110564

Sunday, 07/13/2008 11:54:49 PM

Sunday, July 13, 2008 11:54:49 PM

Post# of 159752
Janice:

I believe the lucrative deal with the hijacker you are referring to is the purported sale of BCIT shell to Pino that as far as I can tell was not properly documented in the form of a sales contract to complete the Carter Care reverse merger, correct? If so, this can be considered to fall into the definition of sleazy.

From Websters New Lexicon Dictionary:
Sleazy - definition states "of poor quality, lacking substance".

This would mean that the manner of sale of BCIT shell was definitely lacking quality in negotiating the deal. It leads one to question why this sale was not being documented properly, which then leads to why did it take almost 3 months for Megas to report the hijacking to proper authorities.

This negligence by the CEO of conducting a sale of property properly is at the heart of why over 1,000 investors' money have been in stalemate for 3 years. Which gets to the reason Clarity was asking why so long.

Time and the Creator of it are my friends

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.