InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,487.03
(
0.25%
)
US TECH 100
19,430.40
(
0.14%
)
Dow Jones
38,834.86
(
0.15%
)
Brent Oil
84.55
(
-0.28%
)
Bitcoin
65,100.01
(
-0.06%
)
Post# of 203990
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

FIAT

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 5903
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/09/2006

FIAT

Re: lmf1264 post# 186575

Sunday, 07/13/2008 8:59:21 PM

Sunday, July 13, 2008 8:59:21 PM

Post# of 203990
Problem is as I understand it, RP made solicitations for $$$ both here and in India and accepted checks w/o booking them. Checks that may have been made out to him.

If the people you reference wrote checks to RP and not XKEM then they and he have real problems that the corp. may not only decline as "illegal", perhaps better put "extra-corporate" in other words not binding on the co. but most likely binding on RP.

The lawyers CAN figure this one out. So too can the judges.

BE LONG OR BE WRONGjw
I get knocked down but I get up again, You're never gonna keep me down-jpl

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up