InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 469
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/10/2008

Re: EarnestDD post# 26628

Thursday, 07/10/2008 1:53:12 AM

Thursday, July 10, 2008 1:53:12 AM

Post# of 29782
Do you listen to your radio with a picture of the trailer that makes the sounds in your mind?

Or do you listen to a radio station for the invisible signal it gives off and thats it?

In my mind, it doesnt matter what houses the equipment, what matters is that it works. I listen to radio stations where the woman sounds like the hottest babe on the planet, but happened to see her in a mall doing a grand opening and saw she was very old and haggered from too many cigarettes. Thats the beauty of radio, they cant see anything! So why the graphic footage? After all stations are notoriously unglamorous, even movie sets in the background. Its all about the end product, not the plush anywhere else.

By the looks of it, the signal was working just that Perihelion wasnt placing in station identification periodically, or repairing a hole in the fence. etc. Older videos tended to have us believe the equipment wasnt working, but seeing the inside lets me know there is some serious hardware inside. How much is it all worth? Lots if you had to buy it new in my mind.

A simple tape splice machine would have been able to add a snipped of that in there of the station identification, that repeats periodically. Fixing a fence again is a simple task.

Minor issues blown up into mountains from moehills. A $15K FCC fine in itself isnt hard to pay off either, so it wouldn't surprise me to see things potentially come back.

Management were busy fixing fences at the bio-site and doing their best to get the plant running, that or putting the brakes on everything for a buyout to occur? The old fence from the bio-site likely would work well at the radio station, but that takes time to move there and install.

The assets are still there and the radio equipment appears to work, so as an investor I like the assets. A competitor company would want things shut down, especially all the other videos from other online or stations who hammered Perihelion at every turn. Advertising dollars, everyone wants them and if a competitor leaves the picture then that means a bigger slice of pie all through the surrounding area, even to the limits of its transmission zone.

What kind of guidelines do the FCC have to follow to protect the companies they fine? After all Perihelion has more then 1 leg of their business. Wouldnt a video of the closed operations of the radio side, be possibly damaging to their other operations such as the bio-plant side or mining operations? Wouldnt a simple closing of the operations suffice, with a simple text news? Why a graphic video instead and who was in charge of that and for what ends or reasons was this graphic video done?

Could Perihelion possible go after the FCC for compensation? Doesnt this unfairly smear the other operations and make it even harder to maintain clients or business? Maybe workers were on holidays or sick when the infractions occurred? A 15K fine is nothing compared to a damaged reputation in other legs of a business and could take years to repair.

Again I dont know everything thats going on here and these are just my own opinions, but I do wish Perihelion well in remaining profitable throughout its setbacks and hope it can resolve the issues it has before it and become successful at what it wants to accomplish. It is after-all, always easier to tear something apart, then it is to create something new or build something from scratch like Perihelion has. Perihelion has ambitious plans, lets hope it can survive its growing pains while it continues to build and ramp up its operations.





Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.