InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 65
Posts 10321
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 06/30/2004

Re: elliot1234 post# 145357

Wednesday, 07/09/2008 12:26:47 PM

Wednesday, July 09, 2008 12:26:47 PM

Post# of 326351
The Wright Brothers , interesting , didn't know that

As regards "the patent office will find out that there was no specific prior art" .... the USPTO already found that there was prior art. They described that finding in detail in a 78-page document.

The USPTO's current interpretation of the prior art/prior patents and their relevance to Claims 1-95 in NEOM's patent-in-question resulted in the USPTO "rejecting" each of those claims in a non-final action. Neomedia can reply/argue.

jonesie

Yorkville / Cornell Tracking Board #board-9964


"I can think of no more valuable commodity than information"