InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 65
Posts 10321
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 06/30/2004

Re: cloud3 post# 145275

Wednesday, 07/09/2008 8:38:44 AM

Wednesday, July 09, 2008 8:38:44 AM

Post# of 326351
Page 3 of the 90008779.pdf file

It would appear that in the chronology of USPTO work to date on the EFF's request for reexamination , it was first stated by the USPTO that Claims 1-95 are subject to reexamination , and then in this most recent non-final action , Claims 1-95 are rejected.

Of course , as has been pointed out , Neomedia can reply to this non-final action wherein the Claims were rejected and make appropriate arguments as to why the Claims should not be rejected .... and then if necessary , appeal any adversarial rulings by the USPTO.

It seems clear that at this point in time the Claims are rejected ... and will remain as such until Neomedia replies , within the stated 60 days ... hopefully with some good arguments.

JMO -jonesie






Yorkville / Cornell Tracking Board #board-9964


"I can think of no more valuable commodity than information"

Yorkville / Cornell Tracking Board #board-9964


"I can think of no more valuable commodity than information"